Sunday, September 2, 2012

How does Input Service Distributor distribute service tax credit?

Taxindiaonline.com - One Stop Destination for Taxman & Taxpayer : Income Tax, Custom, Excise, Service Tax, , International Taxation, Caselaws, Notifications, Circulars, Analysis

 How does Input Service Distributor distribute service tax credit?

By Anuj Bansal, CA  
INPUT Service Distributor means an office of the manufacturer or producer of final products or provider of output service, which receives invoices towards purchases of input services from the provider of input services and further, distribute the Input Tax Credit by issuing invoices, bill or challan to such manufacturer or producer or provider.
Registration of ISD:
ISD shall make an application for registration within a period of thirty days from the commencement of business.
ISD shall issue an Invoice:
Input service distributor shall in respect of credit distributed issue an invoice / bill / challan to each of the recipient of the credit.
Invoice / bill / challan shall have following contents:
++ Serial number.
++ Name, address and registration number of the person providing input services.
++ Serial number and date of invoice of the person providing input services.
++ Name, address and the registration number of the ISD.
++ Name and address of the recipient of the credit distributed.
++ The amount of credit distributed.
++ Signed by the authorized person.
Return:
ISD shall furnish a half yearly return.
Distribution credit by ISD:
As stated above ISD distributes credits to its units providing taxable services or manufacturing excisable goods. The distribution of such credit is subject to the following conditions:
(a) the credit distributed against an eligible document shall not exceed the amount of service tax paid thereon, and
(b) credit of service tax attributable to services used in a unit either exclusively manufacturing exempted goods or exclusively providing exempted services shall not be distributed.
There is no specific method / provision for distribution of credit is prescribed under the law. In the case of Ecof Industries P. Ltd. v. CCE (2010) 17 STR 515 (Tri-Bang.) it has been held that there is no restriction on the distribution of service tax credit. Further, the court observed that in case department wants to place restriction on distribution of service tax credit, the rule is required to be amended. Accordingly, even in case the whole of Input Tax Credit is distributed / transferred to one unit, same shall not be disputed by the department. However, generally the Credit is distributed in accordance to the ratio of turnover of goods / services by each of the unit manufacturing the goods or providing the services. The said method is explained with the help of an example as follows:

Particulars
 
Turnover
Tax
 
 
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
Taxable & Exempted Goods / Services      
Factory Unit - Excisable Goods
(a)
20000000
2400000
       
Unit providing Taxable Services
(b)
10000000
1000000
 
 
   
Unit providing Exempted Services (including trading)
(c)
10000000
1000000
Input Services :      
       
Excise    
Input Services Directly related to Factory Unit
(d)
200000
20000
ISD in relation to Factory Unit
(e) = (o)
 
50000
Total Input Service Tax Available for set-off
(f) = (d) + (e)
 
70000
 
  
Services
  
Input Services Directly related to Unit providing Taxable Services
(g)
500000
50000
ISD in relation to Unit providing Taxable Services
(h) = (p)
 
25000
Total Input Service Tax Available for set-off
(i) = (j) + (k)
 
75000
 
  
Common Services Input
  
- Advertisement
(l)
500000
50000
- Rent of office
(m)
500000
50000
Total
(n) = (l) + (m)
1000000
100000
 
  
Distribution of Input Tax Credit
  
 
  
ISD in relation to Factory Unit
(o) = (n) X (a) / [(a) + (b) +(c)]
 
50000
 
  
ISD in relation to Unit providing taxable Services
(p) = (n) X (b) / [(a) + (b) +(c)]
 
25000
 
  
ISD in relation to Unit providing Exempted Services
(q) = (n) X (c) / [(a) + (b) +(c)]
 
25000
In the light of above discussion, it is stated that in order to distribute input tax credit for the common services, the input tax credit shall be first debited to a separate account (hereinafter referred as ‘ISD A/c'). Thereafter, the total input tax credit in the ISD A/c. shall be distributed in ratio of turnover of goods manufactured, taxable services provided and exempted services provided. The input tax credit pertaining to Excisable Goods shall be transferred to account of Input tax credit A/c. in regard to Factory Unit (hereinafter referred as ITC (Factory) A/c.) and The input tax credit pertaining to Taxable Services shall be transferred to account of Input tax credit A/c. in regard to Unit providing taxable Services(hereinafter referred as ITC (Service Tax) A/c.). The transfer of input tax credit to both the accounts from the ISD A/c. shall be on the strength of Invoice / challan. The company is also required to pass proper entries in the books of accounts for such transfers. Further, it is also informed that Input Tax Credit pertaining to Exempted Services shall be booked as expense and set-off for the same shall not be available.
In the above example total input tax credit in the ISD A/c. is Rs. 1,00,000/- which is distributed between Factory Unit, Unit Providing taxable services and Unit Providing exempted services. The amount of input tax credit pertaining to Factory Unit is Rs. 50,000/- and the amount of input tax credit pertaining to Taxable Services Unit is Rs. 25,000/-. Said amounts shall be transferred to ITC (Factory) A/c. and ITC (Service Tax) A/c. respectively on the strength of Invoice / challan. Further, amount of input tax credit pertaining to exempted services i.e. Rs. 25,000/- shall be booked as expense in the books of accounts.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

LIMITATION FOR REFUND CLAIM - SERVICE TAX

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH AT CHENNAI


        Appeal Nos. ST/684-686/11


[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.165-11 to 167-11 dated 29.9.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore]


For approval and signature:

Hon ble Shri ASHOK JINDAL, Judicial Member


1.    Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT     (Procedure) Rules, 1982?                          :

2.    Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the
    CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?                                :

3.    Whether the Member wishes to see the fair copy of
    the Order?                                      :

4.    Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental
    Authorities?                                  :

   
India Trimmings Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant

        
       Versus
    

Commissioner of Central Excise,
   & Service Tax, Coimbatore

Respondent




Appearance:

Shri M.N.Bharathi, Advocate
Shri D.P. Naidu, SDR

For the Appellant
For the Respondent



CORAM:

Hon ble Shri Ashok Jindal, Judicial Member
               

Date of hearing  :  29.8.2012
Date of decision :  29.8.2012


Final Order No.____________


        The appellants are in appeal against the impugned orders where the refund claims were dismissed on the ground that the same have not been filed within one year of the duty paid. 
2.        The facts of the case are that the appellants are 100% EOU. During the course of their manufacturing activity, they have availed credit on inputs and input services. After manufacturing the goods, they exported the goods. These facts are not in dispute. Initially, the SCNs were issued to the appellants for reversal of the CENVAT credit availed both on inputs and input services as they are not eligible for the same.  The said dispute was settled by the Commissioner (Appeals) in favour of the appellants holding that appellants are eligible to avail CENVAT Credit on the input and input services on 28.1.2009.  Thereafter, the appellants filed refund claims on 13.8.2009 and 5.11.2009 respectively for the period April 2007 to September 2008.  The refund claims were denied as time-barred as per clause (6) of Notification No.5/06 under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules,2004.  Against the said orders, the appellant is before me.
3.        The learned counsel for the appellants submits that as there was a dispute of eligibility of CENVAT credit availed by them, therefore unless and until the dispute is settled, they are not entitled for refund claims and when the dispute was settled in their favour on 28.1.2009, within one year of the said order, they have filed the refund claims. Therefore, they are entitled for refund claims as per Notification No.5/06.  To support his contention, he placed reliance on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of CCE Indore Vs Indorama Exports - 2010 (254) ELT 147 (Tri.-Del.) and Dena Snuff Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner - 2003 (157) ELT 500 (SC).
4.        On the other hand, the learned SDR strongly opposed the contention of the learned counsel and submitted that notification is to be construed strictly and as per clause (6) of the Notification No.5/06, the appellants are required to file refund claim within one year as stated in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act,1944 for availment of the credit. Admittedly, they have not filed refund claims within time. Therefore, they are not entitled for refund claims. To support his contention, he relied on the decision of CCE Hyderabad Vs Sunder Steels Ltd. -  2005 (181) ELT 154 (SC) and Utttam Industries Vs CCE Haryana 2011-TIOL-23-SC-CX.
5.        Heard both sides. Considered their submissions. 
In this case, these facts are not in dispute that initially CENVAT credit availed by the appellant was denied and the same was settled in their favour on 28.1.2009 and within one year of 28.1.2009, they have availed refund claims. As per Notification No.5/06, the assesses are required to file a refund claim within the time prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. As per Section 11B of the Act, the assessees are required to file a refund claim within one year from the relevant date and the limitation of one year shall not apply where duty has been paid under protest. From the facts of the case, it is clear that whether the appellants are entitled for refund or not was in dispute. Therefore, it cannot be said that the CENVAT credit availed by them is the date of availment of credit. That dispute was settled only on 28.1.2009. Therefore, the facts of the case of Indorama Exports (supra) are squarely applicable to the facts of this case wherein this Tribunal had held that limitation shall begin when lis ends.  Therefore, as per Notification No.5/06, the appellants are entitled for refund from the relevant date i.e. settlement of the dispute between the parties.  Therefore, the appellants have filed refund claims within the time prescribed as per Notification No.5/06.  In view of these observations, the appeals are allowed with consequential relief.
   

        (Dictated and pronounced in open court)


                                                       


                                                      (ASHOK JINDAL)
                                              JUDICIAL MEMBER  



gs






6





Friday, August 17, 2012

INPUT SERVICE DISTRIBUTOR from: 01.07.2012

http://taxguru.in/service-tax/input-service-tax-distribution-service-tax-act.html

INPUT SERVICE DISTRIBUTOR – Process Note on ISD Credit Distribution
Definition of ‘Input Service Distributor’:
Rule 2(m) of CCR, 2004 defines “Input Service Distributor” thus –
“input service distributor” means an office of the manufacturer or producer of final products or provider of output service, which receives invoices issued under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 towards purchases of input services and issues invoice, bill or, as the case may be, challan for the purposes of distributing the credit of service tax paid on the said services to such manufacturer or producer or provider, as the case may be;
 Rules governing ‘Input Service Distributor’:
Old Rule 7 of CCR, 2004: [Prior to 01/04/2012]
Rule 7. Manner of distribution of credit by input service distributor – The input service distributor may distribute the CENVAT credit in respect of the service tax paid on the input service to its manufacturing units or units providing output service, subject to the following condition, namely:
(a) The credit distributed against a document referred to in rule 9 does not exceed the amount of service tax paid thereon; or
(b) Credit of service tax attributable to service use in a unit exclusively engaged in manufacture of exempted goods or providing of exempted services shall not be distributed.
Analysis:
Provision of the above rules was simple and did not restrict transfer of entire Cenvat Credit to a single unit.
This made it easier for Regional office / Head office registered under ISD to transfer the credit under a single Invoice to a particular unit.     
The said rules have now been amended, putting strictures on the manner of Transfer of Cenvat Credit by an Input service Distributor which are clarified below.
Input Service Distributor’s choice taken away
Changes in Rule 7 by Budget, 2012: 
For Rule 7 of the said rules, the following rule is substituted:
‘7. Manner of distribution of credit by input service distributor – The input service distributor may distribute the CENVAT credit in respect of the service tax paid on the input service to its manufacturing units or units providing output service, subject to the following conditions, namely:
(a)             The credit distributed against a document referred to in rule 9 does not exceed the amount of service tax paid thereon;
(b)             Credit of service tax attributable to service used in a unit exclusively engaged in manufacture of exempted goods or providing of exempted services shall not be distributed;
(c)            Credit of service tax attributable to service used wholly in a unit shall be distributed only to that unit; and
(d)           Credit of service tax attributable to service used in more than one unit shall be distributed prorata on the basis of the turnover of the concerned unit to the sum total of the turnover of all the units to which the service relates.
Explanation 1 – For the purposes of this rule, – “unit” includes the premises of a provider of output service and the premises of a manufacturer including the factory, whether registered or otherwise.
Explanation 2 – For the purposes of this rule, the total turnover shall be determined in the same manner as determined under rule 5’ which reads as under:
2. “Total turnover” means the sum total of the value of,-
(a)  all output services and exempted services provided, including value of services exported;
(b) all excisable and non excisable goods cleared, including the value of goods exported;
(c) The value of bought out goods sold, during the given period.
Analysis:
If regional office is availing services specifically to cater to a specific unit, then the credit shall be distributed only to that unit; and
In case the service is commonly utilized in 2 or 3 units [e.g. AD I/II], then the credit is to be distributed on the basis of turnover of the concerned unit compared to the sum total of the turnover of all the units to which the service relates.
This means that the distribution of Cenvat credit is linked to the turnover of the units in case of common service utilized in two or more units. This concept was not there before.
Earlier no criteria were fixed but now, the regional office registered as input service distributor has to ascertain the turnover of various units to which it caters and then distribute the credit to only those units (for which service was/is utilized).
Methodology to calculate Eligible Cenvat Credit by Regional Office /HO
 Taxable Turnover
———————                            = Eligible %
Total Turnover
 Taxable Turnover [Excluding Traded Sales]
Details Remarks
Sales of Dutiable Goods- Domestic Assessable Value
Stock Transfer of Dutiable Goods Assessable Value
Sale of Dutiable Goods – Exports Assessable Value
Sale of MRP valued Dutiable Goods Value would be Net of abatement
Service Income Taxable Services Provided
Sale of Dutiable Scarp Assessable Value
 Total Turnover [Includes Traded Margin]
Sales of Dutiable Goods- Domestic Assessable Value
Stock Transfer of Dutiable Goods Assessable Value
Sale of Dutiable Goods – Exports Assessable Value
Sale of MRP valued Dutiable Goods Value would be Net of abatement
Service Income Taxable Services Provided
Sale of Dutiable Scarp Assessable Value
Sale of Misc Non Dutiable Scrap Taxable Value- before Vat/CST
Sale of Asset Value contributing to Profit on sale of Asset
Margin of Traded Goods 10% of COGS or trading profit whichever is higher
 *****All the above values will be net of taxes and duties
***For Head office the Turnover details of entire Group to be applied
***For Regional Office the turnover details of the Region to be applied
The total Eligible Cenvat Credit will be
Cenvat Credit Availed X Eligible %       
Distribution of Cenvat Credit by Regional offices / HO
Distribution of Specific Services
Where services have been availed which is division specific then the same has to be transferred to that division to which the unit belongs.
 Example (1)
Technical services have been availed in relation to goods manufactured by HD, therefore credit for that service has to be transferred to HD only.
Example (2)
Advertisement has been placed for product manufactured by AD. Cenvat credit of service tax on such advertisement services availed will need to be transferred to AD only.
Example (3)
Commission paid to an agency by HO in relation to export of goods manufactured by AD, then credit for that services has to be transferred by HO to AD only.
Distribution of Cenvat related to Common Services
Common services such as:
- security services
- Rent paid for Regional office
- Telephone Services
- Auditing Fees
The Credit is to be distributed prorata on the basis of the turnover of the concerned units.
Unit/Division wise Transfer
As an example
We have AD Division which comprises of following Units
- Unit -I, III,IV V& Spares
- Unit II
When effecting transfer to AD, it would be based on Unit wise turnover determined.[to be cross checked with units]
Reason being every unit has a separate Central Excise Registration
Similarly for HD division which comprise of following units
- HD I
- HD II
- HD IV
CA certificate should be obtained for determining the Cenvat ratio and transfer ratio from service tax audit perspective.
-  Example for transfer of credit to AD
Excisable Turnover of Domestic sales =350000
Excisable Stock Transfer                     =  35000
Export of own goods                          =  50000
Taxable Services Provided                   =  15000
Traded Turnover                                 =100000
COGS of traded goods                        =  73000
Profit on traded goods                        =  27000 [i.e 37%]
10% of COGS of traded goods            =    7300
 Total Cenvat Credit Availed = Basic 15000 +Ed. Cess 300 +SHE Cess 150
           450000
= ________________ = 94%
      450000+27000
Cenvat Eligible for Availing and Transfer = 15450*94%= 14523
[10% of COGS or Margins whichever is higher has to be considered hence 27000 considered]
It is the responsibility of the Regional Office  / HO to ascertain the eligibility and transfer the credit using the above method so that the unit receives credit which need not be attributed further.
Distribution Methodology for Common Input services
Taxable turnover of the Region 450000
 For HD- Unit wise distribution to be done in line with example of AD
Invoice format for distribution of credit to units

                          {LOGO }

Original (for registered person)
 Duplicate (for taking credit)
Triplicate (for Office Use)

(                                 )

___________________

Name

Manager Accounts

INVOICE FOR DISTRIBUTION

(Challan for distribution of input services from registered office under Rule 7 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004)

M/s Abc Limited  (Input Service Distributor)
Deep Mandir,
A Marathe Marg,

Prabhadevi, Mumbai – 400 025


Service Tax Regn. No. ABCDE1234MST001

RANGE – Service Tax Cell
DIVISION – III
Commissionerate : Service Tax I MumbaiSUPDT.GROUP NO –  VIII
INVOICE NO : 01/2012-2013
DATE : June 5, 2012
Name & Address of locationwhere credit is transferred :M/s Abc Limited,AD- Unit-I,MIDC Industrial Area, Allahabad – 430 212.
Transferee’s STC NO.- ABCDE1234MST012
Range : TOWN RANGE II, ALLAHABAD  DIVISION ICommissionerate: ALLAHABAD
Name and Address of person providing input services &Regn No. As per Annexure – A attached.
Sr. No and date of input service provider’s invoice       ————– do ————
Description of input services       ————– do ————
Rate of Duty: Service Tax: ………….  Education Cess……….. H & S Cess…………………….       ————– do ————
Amount of Service Tax:  Education Cess……… H & S Cess……………       ————– do ————
Amount of service tax paid on input services Rs. 2,115.00 (Service Tax)Rs.     42.00 (Education Cess)Rs.     21.00 (Higher & Secondary Education Cess)  Net Rs.2,178.00
Amount in words: Two Thousand One Hundred Seventy Eight only.
Date of payment of value of input services including service tax As per Annexure – A attached.
Certified that the credit of service tax transferred under this challan has not been transferred earlier and shall not be transferred to any other unit / location in future.
(_____________________)

Name

Manager Accounts




 Note: The above credit represents __15___% credit availability for the unit
It would be ideal for Regional office to seek a certificate from a CA for certifying the eligible % of Cenvat Credit as per format below:
——————————————-
CERTIFICATE
We have verified Books of Accounts and other relevant records of M/s. ABC Limited having its office at (Address) for the year ended 31-3-2012. On the basis of our examinations, clarifications and explanations given to us, we certify hereunder the calculation for proportionate credit attributable to the Taxable and exempt goods / services arrived under rule 6(3A)(c) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004:
Detailed working as per Annexure ‘A’ for the financial year 2011-2012
For XYZ
Chartered Accountants
Membership No. XXXXXXX
Date  :  _ _/_ _/2012
Place : Mumbai
————————————————-

Annexure ‘A’

Period 2011-12


 


Excisable  Sales working
Rs.






Gross  sales & service                   550,000.00









Gross Sales                   550,000.00

Less: Excise duty


Less: COGS of Traded Goods     73000.00

Net sales                   477,000.00





Unit Wise
Mfgd
Traded
Service income




AD I-III-IV-V-Spares
202500.00


DD
87000.00


CD
0.00
 100000.00

DD
195750.00


ED
43500.00
0.00

SRO
0.00

 15000.00
LEU II

 0.00

435000.00
100000.00
15000.00
Mfgd  Non-excisable sales



0.00



0.00



0.00



0.00


Total
0.00






Mfgd  Excisable sales


Of Unit & Taxable service income
450000.00






Total
450000.00






% to excisable to total sales
94.%






Note:


If gross amount considered then Less Excise Duty


If net considered Then Excise Duty =0


Author
Dayal R Kundani
dayalkundani@gmail.com